Abr. 17, 2026 1:05 pm

Viganò Denounces an Infiltrated Global Elite and Warns of Censorship in the West

Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò issued a stark warning about what he described as the systematic infiltration of a “dangerous subversive elite” into the highest levels of Western institutions and numerous governments. According to his statement, this process aims to impose the so-called Agenda 2030 through mechanisms that, rather than strengthening democracy, undermine fundamental freedoms and silence dissenting voices.

Viganò argued that in countries that define themselves as democratic, those who expose this phenomenon face censorship, intimidation, smear campaigns, forced psychiatric labeling, and even arrests. In his analysis, this pattern points to a model of control that is gradually consolidating across Europe, Canada, Australia, and other nations linked to international bodies such as the United Nations, NATO, the World Health Organization, and the World Economic Forum.

The archbishop cited the case of German lawyer Reiner Fuellmich as an example of this trend. According to Viganò, Fuellmich is being unjustly imprisoned and remains without a fair trial, not for proven crimes, but for challenging official narratives and dominant power structures. His remarks reflect growing concern among those who warn about the judicial system being used as a tool of political pressure.

Viganò went further, asserting that in his view, those who should be held accountable are not the system’s critics, but influential figures whom he blames for decisions that, he claims, have caused profound harm on a global scale. These statements, delivered in an openly confrontational tone, are part of a broader debate over accountability, transparency, and the limits of power held by political, financial, and technocratic elites.

Finally, the archbishop issued a direct call to Catholics and to all people of good will to raise their voices in defense of those he considers persecuted by an increasingly intolerant globalist model. Regardless of whether one agrees with his conclusions, his remarks reignite a key debate in the Western world: to what extent the promotion of supranational agendas is displacing pluralism, freedom of expression, and the right to question power without fear of reprisal.